|
The
Hidden China
Paul
Hattaway
For centuries
the outside world has yearned to understand the mysterious land of China.
Since the late 1970s--when China again opened her doors to foreign tourists
and businessmen-millions of visitors have flocked into the "Middle Kingdom,"
sampling her sumptuous food, photographing her scenic beauties, and experiencing
her bustling marketplaces.
Few, however,
have been fortunate enough to experience the "hidden" China. Woven into
the mosaic of the largest population on earth is a rich thread. China's
ethnic minorities, though numbering more than 100 million people, are largely
lost amid the vast ocean of 1.2 billion Han Chinese. Although numerically
the minorities of China account for only 6.7 percent of China's population,
they live in 62.5 percent of China's territory.1
Changing
Fortunes
The name
the Chinese use for their country is Zhong Guo, meaning "The Middle
Kingdom." For more than a thousand years the Chinese have believed they
are the cradle of all civilization, the axis for all of mankind. This attitude
surfaced frequently as foreign powers attempted to open China up to trade.
By the beginning
of the 20th century, however, the Chinese felt great shame as a nation.
Parts of their country had been divided up and were controlled by foreign
powers, their economy was in tatters, and the countryside was effectively
ruled by warlords and gangsters.
On the 1st
of October, 1949, Chairman Mao ascended to the podium before one million
spectators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square and triumphantly declared the
founding of the People's Republic of China. China, once shamed and humiliated,
sensed in the founding of the People's Republic that a new dawn had arrived.
However, her reaction was to close the door to foreigners for most of the
next 30 years. Christian missionaries were ordered to depart.
The Communist
government brought a mixture of fortune to China's minority peoples. For
some, such as the Tibetans and Uygurs, the nation's new leaders reacted
mercilessly and violently, not tolerating even the slightest suggestion
of claims to independence by these two peoples. Many soon found the word
of the law and the application of it were two different things. China's
law states: "If any worker of the government unlawfully deprives the citizens
of their rights of lawful religious freedom, or violates the customs and
practices of any minority nationality, he may be sentenced to imprisonment
or compulsory labor for up to two years."2
Yet for some
of the smaller groups, the change meant an end to centuries of exploitation
by greedy landlords and slave owners. It also meant, for some, the first
time they were allowed to "officially exist."
Sun Yat-sen
in the 1920s considered China to consist of only five nationalities. The
Kuomintang government simply denied the existence of ethnic minorities,
regarding them simply-and erroneously-as branches of Han. The original
flag of the Republic of China displayed five colors, representing these
peoples: the Han, Manchu, Mongolians, Tibetans and Uygurs.
Centuries
of hostility and prejudice between the Han Chinese and the minority peoples
had been best illustrated by the Chinese use of the character for "dog"
after the name of a tribe. This was officially banned by the new government
in favor of using the character "nationality." Each officially recognized
minority was allowed a representative to the National Party Congress in
Beijing. More recently, health and education benefits have been given to
minority people. Only those minorities residing predominantly in urban
areas are subject to China's "one-child" policy. Most minority parents
are allowed two children, while others in more remote regions are allowed
three. Some small yet significant gestures of goodwill have been appreciated
by minority peoples. The Miao, for example, who use an abundance of silver
in their traditional costume, are allowed to purchase silver at a much
cheaper rate than other Chinese citizens. As Ralph Covell notes, "Efforts
are being made to remove tensions that have existed for centuries between
Han Chinese and minority nationalities living in the same or nearby areas."3
Origins
Today there
are hundreds of distinct ethnic groups scattered throughout China's territory.
Their languages belong to linguistic families as diverse as Persian, Turkish,
Malayo-Polynesian, Tibeto-Burmese and Siberian. This ethnic composition
is a result of thousands of years of history. Many groups and peoples migrated
their way across the continent, some fleeing persecution, others famine,
and still others just searching for a land where they could live in peace.
Other peoples that appeared in different times in history can no longer
be traced, having been assimilated into the huge Han Chinese race.
Prior to
the 1950s little was known about China's minority peoples. Chinese scholars
did little or no research. The lack of motivation and practical and geographical
barriers kept the minorities of China hidden from the knowledge of the
world.
The majority
of missionaries did not progress past the Chinese coastal areas where they
worked faithfully and valiantly, among the Han Chinese, sowing the seeds
for the great revivals of the last generation. Of course, there was mission
activity among some of the larger and better-known minority groups such
as the Tibetans, Miao, and Mongolians. Some brave and faith-filled souls
ventured to extremely remote border areas to proclaim the Gospel among
groups such as the Lisu, Lahu, Wa and Jingpo.
Due to the
lack of research before the arrival of Communist rule and the ensuing anti-religious
fervor which still continues today, the smaller ethno-linguistic peoples
of China indeed have remained hidden from the Christian world, and therefore
from prayer, awareness, and efforts to evangelize them.
In the 1950s,
motivated by the need to extend its rule to all corners of the nation,
the government commenced a massive project to improve the country's infrastructure.
Millions of miles of railway and roads were constructed across the width
and length of China. Minority villages that had been an arduous two-week
horse ride through dangerous bandit-filled mountains in the 1940s were
now a short flight and bus ride away from a provincial capital.
Perhaps most
important of all, Mandarin became the national language, used in all schools
throughout the nation. Minority tribesmen who previously only saw Han Chinese
on their irregular visits down the mountains to the marketplace are now
able to speak their language. This has made it possible to research and
document the smaller peoples of China and will greatly benefit the advance
of the Gospel among them.
How Many
Groups Are There?
Early writers
were aware of a large number of different tribes and peoples in China,
but had no way of conducting ongoing research or gathering further information
or biographical data. Most simply offered a list of names and locations
to the interested world. The Christian world marveled at the results of
a 1944 survey by missionary John Kuhn who documented 100 tribes in Yunnan
Province alone.
In the early
1950s, China's new constitution declared China to be "a unitary, multi-national
socialist state."4 Leaders from China's minority groups were invited to
come forward and register their groups with the government to be considered
for official recognition. The results, first released in 1953, were staggering.
Over 400 names of groups were submitted of which more than 260 were located
in Yunnan Province alone.5
The Han Chinese,
however, have long viewed the different tribes and nationalities in China
with suspicion at best, and utter contempt at worse. Sun Yat-sen had ominously
stated, "The name 'Republic of Five Nationalities' exists only because
there exists a certain racial distinction which distorts the meaning of
a single republic. We must facilitate the dying out of all the names of
individual peoples inhabiting China."6 The new Communist government, obviously
not willing to deal with so many different tribes and groups, began to
artificially trim the list down to manageable proportions.
In 1956,
sixteen teams were established by the government, with a total of more
than 1,000 people, and sent across China to investigate the claims of the
400 groups that had applied for recognition. "The members included linguists,
archaeologists, historians, economists, and experts in literature and the
arts."7 These teams "collected a large body of data and presented their
views on the classification of minority languages. These form most of the
language information used today on China's minorities."8 The researchers
rejected most of the 400 names, claiming, "Some were different names referring
to the same group of people, some were different branch names of one ethnic
family, some were place names of the areas where the minority groups lived
and some were Chinese transliterations of a group of people."9 While this
is no doubt partially true, any casual researcher of China's ethnic composition
will soon be aware of the existence of many groups in China today that
defy official classification.
By 1964,
the government had managed to reduce the number of groups on their official
list to only 183.10 Dismayed at being rejected, many minorities applied
again in the late 1960s. With the central government still uncomfortable
with the prospect of dealing with so many collective needs, and with administrators
in Beijing no doubt unwilling to welcome hundreds of new "Deputy to the
National Party Congress" representatives, the scholars were sent back to
work. From their revised list of 183, they squeezed together dozens of
groups into broad ethnic classifications, grouping tribes together who,
in many cases, shared no historical kinship and who could not understand
a word of each other's language. In 1976, the State Council of the People's
Republic arrived at a total of just 51 selected "minority nationalities"
in China. Since that time four more have been added, arriving at the current
total of 55 artificially constructed minorities. The State Nationalities'
Affairs Commission now "considers the work of identifying nationalities
virtually complete and is unlikely to accept any of the outstanding claims."11
This has
created a curious situation. At present there are only 21 officially recognized
minorities living in Yunnan Province, but these 21 groups have 138 ethnic
names, with an additional 157 ethnic names given to them by neighboring
peoples.12 The small Shuitian people, living on the Yunnan-Sichuan border,
have been officially included as part of the large Yi minority group, but
"they think of the Yi as mountain barbarians and have no wish to be associated
with them; they are both puzzled and bitter that they have not won recognition
as a separate nationality."13
The Eastern
Lipo people of northern Yunnan were also officially assigned to the Yi
nationality even though their language is much more closely related to
Lisu than Yi. This official classification horrified the Eastern Lipo,
who had been slaves to the Nasu (another Yi group) for centuries. Eastern
Lipo leaders petitioned the government saying they didn't care what minority
group they were assigned to as long as it wasn't the Yi. The government
officials ignored their pleas until recently. Today, on a national level,
the Eastern Lipo continue to be classified as Yi people. On the district,
county and prefecture administrative levels, however, the Eastern Lipo
are now counted as Lisu! The confused classification of the Eastern Lipo
embodies all that is wrong with the government's approach. If any lesson
has to be learned from the Eastern Lipo case, it is that a people group's
self-identity counts for much.
The Nosu
people of northern Yunnan and southern Sichuan, themselves considered only
a branch of the Yi nationality, consist of "44 subgroups with different
self-designations and obscure dialects."14 The eight million Yi people,
rather than being a cohesive ethno-linguistic people group, are instead
a collection of 110 smaller groups, many speaking mutually unintelligible
languages and coming from diverse cultural and historical backgrounds.
One source even goes as far as dividing the Yi into 485 clans-with each
clan occupying a distinct territory.15
Many outsiders
view the nine million Miao as one people group, but from a linguistic viewpoint
they "consist of 30-40 mutually unintelligible dialects (i.e. languages)."16
These languages are not merely slight variations of a common language,
but as Joakim Enwall explains: "In Europe various languages may be mutually
comprehensible to a large extent, like Swedish and Norwegian, or Spanish
and Portuguese. In China dialects are usually not mutually comprehensible,
and in many cases speakers of various sub-dialects have difficulty in understanding
each other."17
In addition
to the Yi, similar cases of many distinct ethno-linguistic peoples being
combined are found with the Tibetans, Miao, Hani, Zhuang, Yao, Dai and
Mongolians. Even Chinese scholars have admitted the true number of distinct
ethnic groups in China is staggeringly high. Among the Yao minority, for
example, "There are thought to be as many as 300 such different appellations...making
research and classification ethnically an impossible task...(the different
Yao groups) are probably not of the same ethnic stock."18
Reaction
to the rejection of official recognition has been violent in some locations.
The small Deng minority group living in southeast Tibet have even "threatened
succession from China if they were not officially recognized as a nationality....
The Tibetan authorities strongly oppose such a move, arguing that it would
split the Tibetan nationality."19
To form the
Ewenki minority, the Solon and the Yakut were combined.20 Even the relatively
small Pumi minority of Yunnan, comprising less than 30,000 people, is a
collection of several tribes, each speaking their own language.21 Few of
the 55 official minorities in China have not been created by a similar
artificial fusion of smaller groups. Furthermore, 748,380 people in the
1990 census were not assigned a minority group because they did not fit
into any of the established categories.22 Most of these are members of
small, distinct tribes. The 1982 census had listed 817,810 people in unclassified
communities, but one Chinese source stated that "the actual number is higher."23
This probably indicates that a number of groups had already been provisionally
placed or marked for placement in existing nationalities.
New information
is continually coming to hand. As anthropologists and linguists begin to
conduct studies in more remote mountainous areas of southwest China, it
can be expected that dozens of more tribes and languages will come to light,
especially among the artificially constructed Yi, Hani, Yao, Tibetan and
Miao nationalities.
Ethno-linguistic
Importance
Since the
gradual opening up of China in the 1980s, numerous Christian workers and
ministries have commenced work in China. Many ministries in China have
wished to focus their energy on China's minority groups. Unfortunately,
because almost all literature on China's minorities excludes any mention
of groups apart from the official 55, most Christians have been forced
to follow the government's artificial classifications. Operation China
contains information on approximately 300 people groups that have never
before appeared on Christian mission ethno-linguistic lists.
Some may
argue it is not important from a missiological view to break the groups
down into an ethno-linguistic classification. They explain that the Gospel
can penetrate into each people group cluster once indigenous believers
are mobilized to spread the Gospel. In China this has proven to be a false
assumption.
Observers
have noted that the Yi nationality contains an estimated 200,000 Christians.
Many would immediately classify them as a "reached" group. This is not
the case, however:
People have
the impression that these groups should be able to effectively evangelize
the other members of the Yi.... However, upon closer inspection it is
found that almost all of the Yi Christians are among the Gani and Lipo....
The other 70 or so Yi groups are totally unreached.... They live as far
as 1,000 km [620 miles] away from the center of Yi Christianity. But even
if the Gani or Lipo Christians should decide to travel and share the Gospel
with other Yi groups they would find it a completely cross-cultural experience.
They would have to learn a new language, in many cases with hardly a single
word the same as their mother tongue, and they will have to learn the
customs and culture of the new people.... Far better if we view all these
groups as separate Gospel targets to begin with.24
It is hoped
that Operation China may spur many to learn about and to pray for
the unreached people groups of China, and to give their time, talents,
energy, resources, and lives, to do whatever is necessary for all of China's
people groups to know the saving grace and the indwelling life of Jesus
Christ. May the Body of Christ of this generation not fail in its attempt
to see God's Kingdom come among all of China's peoples!
ENDNOTES
1. Chinese
Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), Information China (London: Pergamon
Press, 1989), Vol. 3, p. 1248.
2. Article 147 of the Chinese Penal Code.
3. Ralph R. Covell, The Liberating Gospel in China: The Christian Faith
Among China's Minority Peoples (Michigan: Baker Books, 1994), p. 24.
4. CASS, Information China, Vol .3, p. 1247.
5. Fei Xiaotong, "On the Question of Identification of Nationalities in
China," Chinese Social Sciences, No. 1, 1980.
6. Sun Yat-Sen, Memoirs of a Chinese Revolutionary (Taipei: China
Cultural Service, 1953).
7. Colin Mackerras, China's Minorities: Integration and Modernization
in the Twentieth Century (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1994),
pp. 142-43. 8. CASS, Information China, Vol .3, pp. 1281-82.
9. Australian Academy of the Humanities and the Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences, Language Atlas of China (Hong Kong: Longman Group, 1987),
p. A-3.
10. Fei Xiaotong, "Guan Yu Wo Guo Minzu de Shi Bien Wenti" (On the Question
of Ethnic Identification in China), Minzu Yi Shehui, Renmin Chubanshe,
Beijing, 1981, pp. 5, 26.
11. Mackerras, China's Minorities, p. 143.
12. Li Youyi, Ethnology in China (Griffith University Press, 1980),
p. 10. Also see Lin Yuehua, "Zhongguo Xinan Diqu de Minzu Shibie" (Ethnic
Studies in Southwest China), Yunnan Shehui Kexue, 1984, No. 2, p. 1.
13. Stevan Harrell, "Ethnicity and Kin Terms Among Two Kinds of Yi," in
Chiao Chien & Nicholas Tapp, Ethnicity and Ethnic Groups in China
(The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1989), p. 183.
14. Yunnan Shaoshu Minzu (The Ethnic Minorities of Yunnan), Kunming,
1986, pp. 627-28.
15. Hsu Itang (Xu Yitang), Leibo Xiaoliang-shan zhi Lomin (A Report
of the Lolo in Leibo, in the Xiaoliang Mountains) (Chengdu: University
of Nanjing Institute of Chinese Cultural Studies, 1944).
16. Joakim Enwall, A Myth Becomes Reality: History and Development of
the Miao Written Language (Stockholm University: Institute of Oriental
Languages, 1995), Vol. 1, p. 14.
17. Ibid., p. 20.
18. Fei Xiaotong, "Fifty Years Investigation in the Yao Mountains," p.
24 of Jacques Lemoine & Chiao Chien, The Yao of South China: Recent
International Studies (France: Pangu, 1991).
19. Mackerras, China's Minorities, p. 143.
20. Zhang Tianlu, Zhongguo Shaoshu Minzu de Ren Kou (Population
of China's Minority Nationalities), (Liaoning: Renmin Chubanshe, 1987),
p. 2.
21. R. P., "The Pumi People of China," unpublished research paper, 1995.
22. Frontiers Focus, Vol. 4, No. 3.
23. Guizhousheng Shaoshu Minzu Renkou Tongji Ziliao, Minzu Yanjiu
Cankao Ziliao No. 21 (Guiyang: Guizhousheng Minzu Yanjiusuo, 1985), preface.
24. Paul Hattaway, "The Yi of China," research paper cited in A-A-P
Advocate, newsletter of the New Zealand Adopt-a-People Programme, No.
18, August 1996.
Paul Hattaway's
12 years of research on China's unreached people groups has included 150
expeditions into China's cities and remote areas to compile and verify
his data. This article is condensed from the introduction of his book Operation
China available from Piquant Publishers. (ISBN: 0-9535757-5-6)
|